Products related to Morality:
-
Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace : Morality and Law in Cyberspace
Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace, Seventh Edition provides a comprehensive and up-to-date investigation of the internet’s influence on our society and our lives.
Price: 52.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
On Law, Morality, and Politics
The second edition of Aquinas, On Law, Morality, and Politicsretains the selection of texts presented in the first edition but offers them in new translations by Richard J.Regan--including that of his Aquinas, Treatise on Law (Hackett, 2000).A revised Introduction and glossary, an updated select bibliography, and the inclusion of summarizing headnotes for each of the units--Conscience, Law, Justice, Property, War and Killing, Obedience and Rebellion, and Practical Wisdom and Statecraft—further enhance its usefulness.
Price: 19.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Reconciling Law and Morality in Human Rights Discourse : Beyond the Habermasian Account of Human Rights
In this book I argue for an approach that conceives human rights as both moral and legal rights.The merit of such an approach is its capacity to understand human rights more in terms of the kind of world free and reasonable beings would like to live in rather than simply in terms of what each individual is legally entitled to.While I acknowledge that every human being has the moral entitlement to be granted living conditions that are conducive to a dignified life, I maintain, at the same time, that the moral and legal aspects of human rights are complementary and should be given equal weight.The legal aspect compensates for the limitations of moral human rights the observance of which depends on the conscience of the individual, and the moral aspect tempers the mechanical and inhumane application of the law.Unlike the traditional or orthodox approach, which conceives human rights as rights that individuals have by virtue of their humanity, and the political or practical approach, which understands human rights as legal rights that are meant to limit the sovereignty of the state, the moral-legal approach reconciles law and morality in human rights discourse and underlines the importance of a legal framework that compensates for the deficiencies in the implementation of moral human rights.It not only challenges the exclusively negative approach to fundamental liberties but also emphasizes the necessity of an enforcement mechanism that helps those who are not morally motivated to refrain from violating the rights of others.Without the legal mechanism of enforcement, the understanding of human rights would be reduced to simply framing moral claims against injustices. From the moral-legal approach, the protection of human rights is understood as a common and shared responsibility.Such a responsibility goes beyond the boundaries of nation-states and requires the establishment of a cosmopolitan human rights regime based on the conviction that all human beings are members of a community of fate and that they share common values which transcend the limits of their individual states.In a cosmopolitan human rights regime, people are protected as persons and not as citizens of a particular state.
Price: 89.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Passivity Generation : Human Rights and Everyday Morality
The book applies a unique mix of psychosocial methods to understand the complexity of emotional, cognitive and ideological responses to human rights violations and examines the banal quality of the everyday vocabularies that people use to make sense of human rights and their violations, and justify not intervening.In Passivity Generation, Irene Bruna Seu offers a vivid and compassionate account of how past experiences of trauma and suffering affect individual (un)responsiveness, and explores the psychodynamics of passivity and its underpinning defence mechanisms.
Price: 44.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
What is the difference between law and morality?
Law refers to a system of rules and regulations that are enforced by a governing authority, such as a government, and are designed to regulate behavior within a society. Morality, on the other hand, refers to a set of principles and values that guide an individual's sense of right and wrong, and are often influenced by cultural, religious, and personal beliefs. While law is enforced through legal consequences, such as fines or imprisonment, morality is enforced through an individual's conscience and sense of ethical responsibility. Additionally, while laws are created and enforced by a governing authority, morality is often shaped by personal beliefs and societal norms.
-
What is the difference between morality and law?
Morality refers to a set of principles and values that guide an individual's behavior and decision-making based on what is considered right or wrong within a particular culture or society. It is often influenced by personal beliefs, religion, and conscience. On the other hand, law is a system of rules and regulations established by a government or authority to govern a society and enforce order. While morality is subjective and can vary between individuals and cultures, law is objective and applies to everyone within a specific jurisdiction. Additionally, morality is based on ethical principles, while law is based on legal statutes and regulations.
-
What is morality?
Morality refers to a set of principles or values that guide individuals on what is considered right or wrong behavior. It is a code of conduct that helps people make ethical decisions and distinguish between good and bad actions. Morality is often influenced by cultural, religious, and societal norms, and it plays a crucial role in shaping how individuals interact with others and navigate complex ethical dilemmas.
-
Why have law and morality been conceptually separated since Kant?
Law and morality have been conceptually separated since Kant because he argued that moral principles should be based on rationality and universalizability, while laws should be based on social and political considerations. Kant believed that morality should be based on the inherent worth of individuals and their ability to reason, while laws should be based on the need for social order and the protection of individual rights. This separation allows for the recognition of the autonomy of individuals in making moral choices, while also acknowledging the necessity of legal regulations for the functioning of society. Additionally, separating law and morality allows for the recognition of diverse moral beliefs within a society, while still maintaining a system of legal governance.
Similar search terms for Morality:
-
The Authority of Law : Essays on Law and Morality
This classic collection of essays, first published in 1979, has had an enduring influence on philosophical work on the nature of law and its relation to morality.Raz begins by presenting an analysis of the concept of authority and what is involved in law's claim to moral authority.He then develops a detailed explanation of the nature of law and legal systems, presenting a seminal argument for legal positivism.Within this framework Raz then examines the areas of legal thought that have been viewed as impregnated with moral values - namely the social functions of law, the ideal of the rule of law, and the adjudicative role of the courts. The final part of the book is given to understanding the proper moral attitude of a citizen towards the law.Raz examines whether the citizen is under a moral obligation to obey the law and whether there is a right to dissent.Two appendices, added for the revised edition, develop Raz's views on the nature of law, offering a further dialogue with the work of Hans Kelsen, and a reply to Robert Alexy's criticisms of legal positivism. This revised edition makes accessible one of the classic works of modern legal philosophy, and represents an ideal companion to Raz's new collection, Between Authority and Interpretation.
Price: 42.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
A Global Political Morality : Human Rights, Democracy, and Constitutionalism
In A Global Political Morality, Michael J. Perry addresses several related questions in human rights theory, political theory and constitutional theory.He begins by explaining what the term 'human right' means and then elaborates and defends the morality of human rights, which is the first truly global morality in human history.Perry also pursues the implications of the morality of human rights for democratic governance and for the proper role of courts - especially the US Supreme Court - in protecting constitutionally entrenched human rights.The principal constitutional controversies discussed in the book are capital punishment, race-based affirmative action, same-sex marriage, physician-assisted suicide and abortion.
Price: 29.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Trialectic : The Confluence of Law, Neuroscience, and Morality
A thought-provoking examination of how insights from neuroscience challenge deeply held assumptions about morality and law. As emerging neuroscientific insights change our understanding of what it means to be human, the law must grapple with monumental questions, both metaphysical and practical.Recent advances pose significant philosophical challenges: how do neuroscientific revelations redefine our conception of morality, and how should the law adjust accordingly?Trialectic takes account of those advances, arguing that they will challenge normative theory most profoundly.If all sentient beings are the coincidence of mechanical forces, as science suggests, then it follows that the time has come to reevaluate laws grounded in theories dependent on the immaterial that distinguish the mental and emotional from the physical.Legal expert Peter A. Alces contends that such theories are misguided—so misguided that they undermine law and, ultimately, human thriving. Building on the foundation outlined in his previous work, The Moral Conflict of Law and Neuroscience, Alces further investigates the implications for legal doctrine and practice.
Price: 28.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Future Morality
The world is changing so fast that it's hard to know how to think about what we ought to do.We barely have time to reflect on how scientific advances will affect our lives before they're upon us.New kinds of dilemma are springing up. Can robots be held responsible for their actions? Will artificial intelligence be able to predict criminal activity?Is the future gender-fluid? Should we strive to become post-human? Should we use drugs to improve our intimate relationships -- or to reduce crime?Our intuitions about questions like these are often both weak and confused.David Edmonds has put together a philosophical task force to get to grips with these challenges.Twenty-nine philosophers present provocative and engaging pieces about aspects of life today, and life tomorrow -- birth and death, health and medicine, brain and body, personal relationships, wrongdoing and justice, the internet, animals, and the environment.The future won't look the same when you've finished this book.
Price: 12.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
-
Is there only subjective morality or is there also objective morality?
There is ongoing debate about whether morality is purely subjective or if there are objective moral truths. Some argue that morality is entirely subjective, meaning that it is based on individual beliefs, cultural norms, and personal experiences. Others believe in the existence of objective moral principles that are independent of individual perspectives and cultural influences. This debate is complex and has been discussed by philosophers and ethicists for centuries, and there is no consensus on the matter.
-
Did Nietzsche want to abolish morality or enforce the master morality?
Nietzsche did not want to abolish morality altogether, but rather to challenge and critique the existing moral values of his time. He sought to undermine the traditional Christian morality, which he saw as promoting weakness and submission, and instead advocated for the reevaluation and redefinition of values based on what he called the "master morality." This master morality emphasized strength, power, and individual will, and Nietzsche believed it to be more in line with human nature and the pursuit of greatness. Therefore, Nietzsche aimed to enforce the master morality as a replacement for the prevailing moral values of his time.
-
Is morality scientifically explainable?
Morality is a complex concept that is influenced by a variety of factors, including cultural, social, and psychological elements. While scientific research can provide insights into the origins and development of moral beliefs and behaviors, it may not be able to fully explain the subjective and value-laden nature of morality. Additionally, moral judgments often involve emotions, intuitions, and personal experiences that may not be easily captured or explained by scientific methods alone. Therefore, while science can contribute to our understanding of morality, it may not be able to provide a complete and definitive explanation.
-
What is Philistine morality?
Philistine morality refers to a set of values and beliefs that prioritize material wealth, superficial appearances, and conformity to societal norms over deeper ethical considerations. It is often associated with a lack of intellectual or artistic appreciation, as well as a focus on immediate gratification and self-interest. The term "Philistine" originally referred to a group of people in ancient times who were considered uncultured and unrefined, and today it is used metaphorically to criticize individuals or societies that prioritize materialism and conformity over more meaningful or ethical pursuits.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.